A multi-method study on GPs’ perspectives on Lipoprotein(a) as an actionable cardiovascular risk factor - Summary - MDSpire

A multi-method study on GPs’ perspectives on Lipoprotein(a) as an actionable cardiovascular risk factor

  • By

  • Wann Jia Loh

  • Linh Thai

  • Yufan Yang

  • Jonathan Yeo

  • Bik Ling Poon

  • Andy Wong

  • Roy K. L. Teow

  • Elaine Lum

  • June 12, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To explore general practitioners’ perspectives and practices on the detection and management of elevated Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and assess the impact of LILAC-for-Lp(a) training on GPs’ confidence in managing Lp(a).

Approach:
    Key Findings:
    • Only two GPs routinely tested for Lp(a) in high cardiovascular risk patients, highlighting a significant gap in practice.
    • Eight categories emerged under four themes: current context, patient selection for testing, barriers and enablers, and patient acceptance of testing.
    • Barriers to Lp(a) testing included lack of management pathways, out-of-pocket costs, low public awareness, and knowledge gaps among healthcare providers, indicating a need for systemic changes.
    • The LILAC-for-Lp(a) educational framework significantly improved GPs' confidence in managing Lp(a) (p < 0.001), suggesting effective training can enhance clinical practice.
    Interpretation:

    The study highlights significant barriers to the integration of Lp(a) testing in routine practice among GPs, while the educational intervention showed promise in enhancing their confidence, indicating a potential pathway for improving patient care.

    Limitations:
    • Small sample size of focus group participants (n = 18) may limit the generalizability of findings.
    • Limited generalizability due to the study being conducted in a specific region (Singapore), and potential biases in focus group discussions.
    Conclusion:

    Barriers to testing and managing Lp(a) among GPs include unclear management pathways and insufficient training, but the LILAC-for-Lp(a) educational framework positively influenced GPs' perspectives, underscoring the need for continued educational efforts.

Original Source(s)

Related Content