Physician- and Practice-Level Variation in Clinical Trial Participation Among Patients With Advanced Cancer - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Variability in Clinical Trial Enrollment for Patients with Advanced Cancer at the Physician and Practice Levels

  • By

  • Changchuan Jiang

  • Chuan Angel Lu

  • Joshua M. Liao

  • Ryan D. Nipp

  • K. Robin Yabroff

  • Helen H. Moon

  • Song Zhang

  • Xin Hu

  • Tian Zhang

  • October 6, 2026

Share

Objective:

To quantify differences in clinical trial participation and determine associated delivery system factors among patients with advanced cancer.

Approach:
  • Study Design: A retrospective observational cohort analysis using the US Flatiron Health Research Database, examining over 200,000 patients with advanced cancer.
  • Data Collection: Utilized structured and unstructured deidentified information, including demographics and clinical variables, from over 280 clinical sites.
  • Eligibility Criteria: Included adults aged 18 years or older diagnosed with one of 14 advanced or metastatic solid malignancies from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2024.
  • Outcome Measurement: Clinical trial participation was operationalized as receipt of a clinical study drug, extracted from electronic health records.
Key Findings:
  • Enrollment in clinical trials for advanced cancer remains below 10% despite patient willingness.
  • Variation in trial participation is influenced by physician referral practices and practice infrastructure.
  • The study highlights the need to characterize physician and practice-level contributions to trial enrollment variability.
Interpretation:

The principal bottleneck for clinical trial enrollment resides in the clinical delivery architecture rather than patient-level obstacles.

Limitations:
  • The study was exempt from Institutional Review Board review, which may limit generalizability.
  • Data was derived from a single database, potentially introducing selection bias.
Conclusion:

Understanding the variability in trial participation at the physician and practice levels is essential for identifying systemic bottlenecks and improving access to clinical trials.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content