3% diquafosol sodium combined with 0.1% fluorometholone for postoperative dry eye in pterygium patients with preoperative tear deficiency: a pilot retrospective study - Summary - MDSpire

3% diquafosol sodium combined with 0.1% fluorometholone for postoperative dry eye in pterygium patients with preoperative tear deficiency: a pilot retrospective study

  • By

  • Qin Tian

  • Xingde Liu

  • Zhangquan Peng

  • Jiaqian Li

  • Juan Xie

  • Dan Zhang

  • Juan Du

  • June 30, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of 3% diquafosol sodium combined with 0.1% fluorometholone for postoperative dry eye in pterygium patients with preoperative tear deficiency.

Approach:
  • Study Design: Single-center retrospective study involving 82 pterygium patients with preoperative tear deficiency.
  • Patient Groups: Patients were divided into an observation group (diquafosol + fluorometholone, n = 42) and a control group (sodium hyaluronate + fluorometholone, n = 40).
  • Outcome Measures: Tear break-up time (BUT), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Schirmer I test (SIt), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were assessed preoperatively and at 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively.
Key Findings:
  • At 4 weeks postoperatively, the observation group showed significantly longer BUT, lower CFS and OSDI scores, and higher SIt values compared to the control group (all p < 0.05).
  • No significant intergroup differences in IOP were observed at any time point.
  • Transient ocular stinging occurred in 2 patients (4.88%) in the observation group, with no severe complications in either group.
Interpretation:

The combination of 3% diquafosol sodium and 0.1% fluorometholone showed preliminary evidence of improving tear film stability, repairing ocular surface damage, and alleviating dry eye symptoms in pterygium patients with preoperative tear deficiency, without significantly affecting IOP.

Limitations:
  • This was a pilot study with a small sample size.
  • The study was retrospective and lacked randomization.
Conclusion:

The findings support further investigation in larger, longer-term randomized controlled trials.

Original Source(s)

Related Content