Children With Diabetes and At Least One Non-Autoimmune Feature Should Be Considered for Monogenic Diabetes Testing - Summary - MDSpire

Children With Diabetes and At Least One Non-Autoimmune Feature Should Be Considered for Monogenic Diabetes Testing

  • By

  • Rebecca Myers

  • Melek Yildiz

  • Mehmet Nuri Ozbek

  • Jaida Manzoor

  • Mohsina Ibrahim

  • Chittaranjan Yajnik

  • Muge Atar

  • Zeynep Şiklar

  • Sezer Acar

  • Evgenia Globa

  • Omneya Magdy Omar

  • Huseyin Demirbilek

  • Samar Hassan

  • Korcan Demir

  • Misbah Hanif

  • Tulay Guran

  • Nihal Hatipoglu

  • Cemil Koçyiğit

  • Kevin Colclough

  • Jayne Houghton

  • Andrew Hattersley

  • Rachel Van Heugten

  • Kashyap Patel

  • Monogenic Diabetes Consortium

  • Y Abdelmeguid

  • S Abourazzak

  • A Annamalai

  • E Bhowmik

  • G Catli

  • S Chapman

  • H Eideh

  • V Jain

  • T Kontbay

  • V Mulliqi Kotori

  • G Supriya

  • S Musa

  • M Šandrk Beslać

  • M Sharaf

  • J Yong

  • G Yesiltepe Mutlu

  • R Yildirim

  • O Yilmaz

  • M Berberoglu

  • T Akcay

  • C Datar

  • S Dhadge

  • K Jog

  • August 1, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To determine if genetic testing for monogenic diabetes should be performed for all children with diabetes and at least one clearly defined non-autoimmune extra-pancreatic feature.

Key Findings:
  • 33% of children had confirmed monogenic diabetes, highlighting the need for genetic testing.
  • 84% of monogenic cases had recessive etiologies, primarily involving WFS1, SLC19A2, and SLC29A3, indicating specific genetic targets for testing.
  • Higher parental consanguinity (62% vs 19%) and multi-organ system features (53% vs 28%) were observed in monogenic cases, suggesting a genetic basis for these features.
  • Children with low T1DGRS and negative/untested antibodies were more likely to have a monogenic cause, emphasizing the importance of these biomarkers in testing.
Interpretation:

Children with diabetes and at least one non-autoimmune extra-pancreatic feature should be considered for monogenic diabetes testing, as islet-autoantibodies and T1DGRS can significantly aid in prioritizing genetic testing, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Limitations:
  • Potential for excessive testing in consanguineous populations, which may lead to misinterpretation of results and unnecessary anxiety for families.
  • Limited research on recessively inherited diabetes syndromes, which may hinder accurate diagnosis and treatment.
Conclusion:

Genetic testing for monogenic diabetes is warranted in pediatric patients with specific clinical features to guide treatment and management.

Original Source(s)

Related Content