To assess the use of social media and AI tools for health information and advice among U.S. adults, particularly focusing on demographic differences.
Approach:
Key Findings:
31% of adults use social media monthly for health information, while 29% use AI tools, with notable adoption among Hispanic adults.
Use of AI tools has nearly doubled in the past two years, from 17% to 29%.
Younger adults are more likely to use social media, while those aged 30-49 prefer AI.
Social media attracts lower-income adults, whereas AI use is more common among higher-income individuals.
36% of social media users seek information from peers with similar health conditions.
Interpretation:
The findings indicate a shift towards non-traditional sources for health information, with demographic differences in platform usage.
Limitations:
Majorities report infrequent use of AI tools and social media for health information, and self-reported data may introduce bias.
Confidence in discerning accurate information may lead to less validation of sources.
Conclusion:
The survey highlights the growing reliance on social media and AI for health guidance, particularly among younger and lower-income demographics, suggesting a need for targeted health communication strategies.
The partner in the next room, the hormone in the blister pack, the cat on the couch, the minute-long chair stand. Several new studies suggest the factor shaping outcomes may be the one clinicians aren’t routinely measuring.
Claims-based target trial emulation found no clear association between continued GLP-1 receptor agonist use in early pregnancy and nonlive birth, fetal growth abnormalities, or major congenital malformations.
