Vancomycin dosing in critically ill patients receiving renal replacement therapy: a critical appraisal of the toxicity threshold and external validation - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Evaluating Vancomycin Dosage in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Renal Replacement Therapy: Insights on Toxicity Thresholds and External Validation

  • By

  • Jiaojiao Zhou

  • Haibo Lei

  • Ronghui Li

  • Xiang Liu

  • Guanghui Chen

  • September 22, 2026

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the vancomycin dosing nomograms for critically ill patients undergoing renal replacement therapy and address concerns regarding toxicity thresholds and external validation.

Approach:
  • Toxicity Threshold Evaluation: Critique of the toxicity threshold used in dosing simulations, suggesting it should align with the 2020 ASHP/IDSA/PIDS/SIDP guideline of 600 mg·h/L.
  • External Validation Reporting: Assessment of the external validation dataset's predictive performance, highlighting discrepancies in model performance across different patient populations.
  • Stratification Variable Omission: Discussion on the omission of residual urine output as a stratification variable in the nomogram, which may affect vancomycin clearance.
Key Findings:
  • The authors used a toxicity threshold of AUC0−24 h ≥ 700 mg·h/L, which contradicts the guideline recommendation to maintain AUC below 600 mg·h/L.
  • External validation showed a median prediction error of 81.9% in a separate dataset, indicating systematic overprediction of vancomycin concentrations.
  • Residual urine output, which affects vancomycin clearance, was not included as a stratification variable in the nomogram.
Limitations:
  • The toxicity threshold used in simulations does not align with current clinical guidelines.
  • External validation results were not fully reported, showing significant overprediction in a separate dataset.
  • The nomogram does not account for residual urine output, which may lead to subtherapeutic dosing in certain patient populations.
Conclusion:

The toxicity threshold should be revised to 600 mg·h/L, and the findings from external validation should be transparently presented.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content