Utility of New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in assessing bullfighting trauma: experience from a level I hospital - Summary - MDSpire

Utility of New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in assessing bullfighting trauma: experience from a level I hospital

  • By

  • Manuel José Torres-Jurado

  • Juan Ramón Gómez-López

  • Jeancarlos Jhosmer Trujillo-Díaz

  • Francesco Schenone

  • Ana Benítez-Riesco

  • María Pilar Concejo-Cutoli

  • Laura Vicente-González

  • Carlos Vaquero Puerta

  • Juan Carlos Martín-del Olmo

  • February 5, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the New Injury Severity Score (NISS) for classifying bullfighting-related injuries, emphasizing its effectiveness in triaging and managing trauma patients in the context of high-energy trauma events.

Key Findings:
  • Cohort comprised 149 men and 5 women, median age 32 years.
  • 74.7% of cases involved open trauma, with goring as the predominant mechanism (85.1%).
  • Median NISS score was 5; 80.5% classified as mild trauma, indicating a predominance of less severe injuries.
  • Surgical intervention required in 92.2% of cases, with 14% experiencing postoperative complications, highlighting the need for careful monitoring.
  • In-hospital survival rate was 99.3%, with one intraoperative death, underscoring the effectiveness of surgical interventions.
Interpretation:

The NISS scale effectively stratifies bullfighting trauma severity, identifying patients at higher risk for morbidity and mortality, particularly those with severe injuries, which is crucial for timely intervention.

Limitations:
  • Retrospective, single-centre design may introduce biases.
  • Small sample size, especially for moderate-severe and severe trauma cases, limits generalizability.
Conclusion:

The study supports the utility of the NISS in managing bullfighting-related injuries, highlighting the need for larger multicentre studies to validate findings and improve trauma care.

Original Source(s)

Related Content