“A long bristling road full of adventure, full of discovery” gene therapy approaches in transfusion-dependent thalassemia: The EHA-EBMT consensus paper - Summary - MDSpire
The article describes the EHA–EBMT consensus update on selecting patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) for gene therapy (GT), incorporating newer treatments, transplantation data, and gene therapy evidence.
Approach:
Evidence reviewed: The panel reviewed newer TDT treatments, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) data, clinical studies of gene addition and gene editing, available follow-up, and literature on early mortality and organ complications.
Candidate assessment: The revised selection flow chart places liver disease assessment centrally and considers cumulative iron-related injury and the history of liver disease, including iron accumulation and chelation, hepatitis, alcohol use, and metabolic disorders. The panel also considered other organ complications and thrombophilic status.
Follow-up: The authors established short-, medium-, and long-term follow-up in accordance with EMA and FDA requirements.
Key Findings:
The consensus updates a 2021 document focused on gene addition and incorporates advances in treatments, transplantation, and gene therapy studies.
The panel treats hepatic fibrosis as a marker of oxidative stress accumulated over time. Liver assessment considers tissue injury and the history of liver disease, not iron burden alone.
The panel identified patients who require liver biopsy to establish liver disease before GT and stated that biopsy samples should be accurate and representative.
Selection considerations include cardiomyopathy, endocrinopathy, nephropathy, thrombophilic status, age, iron overload, and organ damage.
Follow-up data for TDT patients treated with GT remain limited in patient numbers and duration. Further information is needed, including on survival relative to healthy populations and HCT.
Interpretation:
The authors describe the EHA–EBMT algorithm as a means of prioritizing TDT patients considered most likely to benefit from GT, while noting that further follow-up evidence is needed.
Limitations:
Follow-up data after GT in TDT remain limited in both the number of treated patients and duration of observation.
The authors raise concerns about access because of GT costs, the scarcity of experienced centers, and health-system constraints, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
Conclusion:
The EHA–EBMT algorithm is intended to support prioritization of TDT patients for gene therapy.
CAR T Vision aims to widen access to cell therapy by expanding community-based delivery, easing operational barriers, and building sustainable funding models