Nocturnal intravenous gamma-hydroxybutyrate and sleep architecture in non-sedated intensive care unit patients: a polysomnographic experience - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Effects of Overnight Intravenous Gamma-Hydroxybutyrate on Sleep Architecture in Uns sedated ICU Patients: A Polysomnographic Study

  • By

  • Florian Blanchard

  • Isabelle Arnulf

  • Noémie Clavieras

  • Fanny Charbonnier-Beaupel

  • Rayan Braik

  • Arthur James

  • Jean-Michel Constantin

  • October 30, 2026

Share

Objective:

To describe sleep architecture, perceived sleep quality, and tolerability after overnight intravenous gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) in awake, non-sedated ICU patients.

Approach:
  • Design and setting: Small, uncontrolled observational experience in a general ICU; 13 patients had interpretable ambulatory polysomnography recordings.
  • Intervention and assessment: Eight patients received intravenous GHB from 22:00 to 06:00; five did not. Sleep was scored using American Academy of Sleep Medicine rules, with morning sleep-quality ratings, nurse assessments, and electrolyte measurements.
Key Findings:
  • Compared with patients not given GHB, recipients had higher median sleep efficiency (82% vs. 57%; difference 21 percentage points, 95% CI 7–35) and a greater proportion of sleep in N3 (58% vs. 8%; difference 48 percentage points, 95% CI 18–76).
  • REM sleep was less frequent with GHB (5% vs. 13%) and absent in two recipients.
  • All eight GHB recipients were judged by nurses to have slept, compared with two of five patients without GHB; median sleep-quality ratings were 6 vs. 4.
  • No bradycardia, hypotension, desaturation, vomiting, or seizures were observed. Morning sodium was higher after GHB (140 vs. 135 mmol/L); three patients had recurrent arousals from slow-wave sleep, and one became agitated late in the night.
Interpretation:

The authors report that GHB appeared feasible and was associated with longer, deeper, and better-perceived sleep, but note that polysomnography may not distinguish physiological N3 sleep from drug-induced delta activity. The clinical significance of the apparent N3 increase and the effect of reduced REM sleep remain uncertain.

Limitations:
  • The experience included only 13 patients and was uncontrolled.
  • GHB was preferentially given to patients who had slept poorly the preceding night, creating potential confounding by indication and regression to the mean.
  • No pretreatment polysomnographic recording was available.
  • A single night cannot establish whether REM sleep recovers or remains suppressed with repeated administration.
Conclusion:

The authors state that these findings require confirmation before routine use and report that the GAMMA-SLEEP randomized, placebo-controlled trial is scheduled to begin in October 2026.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content