Complications following operative versus nonoperatively managed isolated distal third ulna shaft fractures: a retrospective single-institution cohort study - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Outcomes of Surgical versus Conservative Treatment for Isolated Distal Third Ulna Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis from a Single Institution

  • By

  • Kathryn Schultz

  • Joyce En-Hua Wang

  • Brock Manley

  • Kacy Peek

  • September 23, 2026

Share

Objective:

To compare healing and complication rates among patients treated operatively and non-operatively for isolated distal third ulnar shaft fractures.

Approach:
  • Study Design: Retrospective cohort analysis of patients with isolated distal third ulnar shaft fractures treated between 2017 and 2024.
  • Cohort Identification: Patients were identified through electronic health records and categorized into operative and nonoperative cohorts based on treatment received.
  • Data Collection: Data on demographics, complications, and outcomes were collected from medical records, including pain scores and radiographic union assessments.
  • Statistical Analysis: An intention-to-treat framework was applied, using chi-square, Fisher’s exact tests, and Student’s T-tests for outcome comparisons.
Key Findings:
  • 44 patients (78.6%) were managed nonoperatively and 12 (21.4%) operatively.
  • Mean age was 49.0 years in the nonoperative group and 38.6 years in the operative group.
  • Males constituted a greater proportion of the nonoperative cohort (61.4%) compared to the operative cohort (16.7%).
  • Motor vehicle collisions were the predominant injury mechanism (42.9%).
  • Complication rates and healing outcomes were not specified in the provided summary.
Limitations:
  • Retrospective design may introduce bias.
  • Small sample size may limit generalizability.
  • Lack of systematic follow-up imaging may affect assessment of union.

Original Source(s)

Related Content