Global benchmarks for minimally invasive right hemicolectomy for cancer - Summary - MDSpire

Global benchmarks for minimally invasive right hemicolectomy for cancer

  • By

  • Fariba Abbassi

  • Michaela Ramser

  • Matthias Pfister

  • Roxane D Staiger

  • Sun J Kim

  • Ji W Park

  • Bart C T van de Laar

  • Marcos Gonzalez

  • Vittoria Perano

  • Georgette Camilleri

  • David Merino

  • Justin Dourado

  • Anjelli Wignakumar

  • Kohei Shigeta

  • Tomás Mansur Duarte de Miranda Marques

  • Daniel Leonard

  • Kai-Yin Lee

  • Avanish Saklani

  • Kilian G M Brown

  • Fabio Butti

  • Ivana Raguz

  • Carlo Alberto Schena

  • Daichi Kitaguchi

  • Desmond C Winter

  • Masaaki Ito

  • Nicola de’Angelis

  • Dieter Hahnloser

  • Jennifer Vu

  • Ashwin Desouza

  • Bei-En Siew

  • Ker-Kan Tan

  • Alex Kartheuser

  • Samuel Aguiar

  • Koji Okabayashi

  • Carl J Brown

  • Steven Wexner

  • Sebastiano Biondo

  • Danilo Miskovic

  • Antonino Spinelli

  • Carlos A Vaccaro

  • Esther C J Consten

  • Byung S Min

  • Milo A Puhan

  • Matthias Turina

  • December 16, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To establish benchmark cut-offs for outcome parameters in elective minimally invasive right hemicolectomy for adenocarcinoma of the ascending colon, thereby enhancing surgical quality and patient care.

Key Findings:
  • Establishment of benchmark cut-offs for 19 clinically relevant outcome measures, including specific metrics.
  • Identification of ideal and non-ideal patient cohorts to derive benchmarks.
  • Highlighting the need for centralized, high-volume surgical practices to improve outcomes.
Interpretation:

The study underscores the importance of benchmarking in surgical outcomes, particularly for right hemicolectomy, to enhance quality and patient care, with significant implications for practice.

Limitations:
  • Data may not fully represent all surgical practices due to the exclusion of lower-volume centres; this could limit the generalizability of the findings.
  • Potential variability in data collection and reporting across participating centres may affect the reliability of the benchmarks.
Conclusion:

The establishment of benchmark cut-offs aims to improve surgical quality and patient outcomes in minimally invasive right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer, emphasizing the critical role of benchmarking in surgical practice.

Original Source(s)

Related Content