Timing Considerations for Endovascular Intervention in Patients with Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: Insights from a Single-Center Real-World Analysis - Summary - MDSpire

Timing Considerations for Endovascular Intervention in Patients with Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: Insights from a Single-Center Real-World Analysis

  • By

  • Yang Yang

  • Xiaoya Wang

  • Jialiang Lu

  • Ye Li

  • Lili Zhao

  • Yating Jian

  • Tao Li

  • Meijuan Dang

  • Ziwei Lu

  • Fangcun Li

  • Fan Tang

  • Qingyu Fan

  • Ning Bu

  • Huqing Wang

  • Ru Zhang

  • An Wen

  • Guilian Zhang

  • Hong Fan

  • Lei Zhang

  • April 22, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To determine the optimal timing of endovascular treatment for acute cerebral infarction with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (sICAS) in real-world practice, highlighting its significance in improving patient outcomes.

Key Findings:
  • 30-day stroke or death rates were 11.3% in early and 8.3% in delayed groups (p = 0.521).
  • Unfavorable 90-day outcomes were 18.9% in early and 10.7% in delayed groups (p = 0.145).
  • Independent factors influencing intervention timing included higher preoperative NIHSS, albumin-to-globulin ratio, and LDL levels, with statistical significance noted.
  • For posterior circulation lesions, early intervention led to more unfavorable outcomes compared to delayed intervention (29.2% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.033).
Interpretation:

In anterior circulation sICAS with minor stroke, intervention timing may be flexible, while basilar artery lesions are better suited for delayed intervention, which has implications for clinical decision-making.

Limitations:
  • text
Conclusion:

Further prospective studies are needed to validate the findings regarding optimal intervention timing for sICAS, emphasizing the importance of these findings in guiding future research.

Original Source(s)

Related Content