Engagement and outcomes of children and adolescents enrolled in a technology-enabled mental health treatment platform: A retrospective cohort study: Differences by gender and age group - Summary - MDSpire

Engagement and outcomes of children and adolescents enrolled in a technology-enabled mental health treatment platform: A retrospective cohort study: Differences by gender and age group

  • By

  • Valerie L. Forman-Hoffman

  • Inderpeet Dhillon

  • Edward Hsyeh

  • Manoj Kanagaraj

  • Matthew Ceneviva

  • Alex Gille

  • Cynthia Grant

  • July 3, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To descriptively characterize engagement and symptom change among adolescents receiving care through the Grow Therapy technology-enabled mental health care platform and examine differences by gender and age group.

Approach:
  • Study Design: Retrospective cohort study including two intent-to-treat cohorts of adolescents aged 9 to 17 years with moderate depressive (n=9,853) and anxiety symptoms (n=9,996) from January 1, 2022, to April 30, 2024. Intent-to-treat analysis was used to include all participants as randomized, regardless of their adherence to the treatment protocol.
  • Data Collection: Deidentified demographic and clinical data were collected as part of treatment engagement, including the number of visits with Grow Therapy providers.
  • Treatment Model: Grow Therapy is a technology-enabled platform providing telehealth-delivered psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, allowing parents to select preferred provider characteristics.
Key Findings:
  • 72.6% of patients in the depressive cohort also had anxiety symptoms.
  • 43.7% of patients in the depressive cohort and 43.2% in the anxiety cohort had sufficient data for clinical symptom analyses.
Interpretation:

The study provides descriptive evidence of engagement and symptom change in adolescents using a technology-enabled mental health platform, highlighting the need for further research on real-world outcomes.

Limitations:
  • The study relies on deidentified data, which may limit the depth of analysis and the ability to draw comprehensive conclusions.
  • Findings may not be generalizable beyond the specific platform and population studied.
Conclusion:

The analysis contributes to understanding adolescent mental health treatment engagement and outcomes within the context of a technology-enabled platform.

Original Source(s)

Related Content