Feasibility of a standardized three-dose intravenous tranexamic acid protocol in bariatric surgery: a pilot study - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Pilot Evaluation of a Standardized Three-Dose Intravenous Tranexamic Acid Regimen for Bariatric Surgery

  • By

  • Paola Llamuca-Castro

  • Diego Lima

  • Arturo Estrada

  • Jason Xia

  • Yeisson Rivero-Moreno

  • Raquel Nogueira

  • Ya Zhou

  • Tiwalade Adediji

  • Joseph Vazzana

  • Diego Camacho

  • Jenny Choi

  • Erin Moran-Atkin

  • October 7, 2026

Share

Objective:

Assess the feasibility of implementing a standardized three-dose intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) regimen in routine metabolic bariatric surgery, with exploratory assessment of clinical outcomes.

Approach:
  • Design and setting: Prospective cohort investigation at one academic center from September 2023 to August 2024, using alternating three-month TXA and non-TXA periods.
  • Participants: Of 1,122 screened patients, 1,077 adults without absolute TXA contraindications were included; procedures were sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or revisional surgery.
  • Intervention: The TXA regimen was three intravenous 1-g doses at anesthesia induction, the evening of surgery, and the following morning. Both groups received standardized thromboprophylaxis.
  • Outcomes: Primary feasibility measures were recruitment, intervention and dosing adherence, and completeness of 30-day follow-up. Exploratory outcomes included clinically significant bleeding, operative time, length of stay, and thromboembolic events.
Key Findings:
  • The provided context reports that 1,077 patients were included: 549 in TXA periods and 528 in non-TXA periods. It does not include feasibility results or comparative clinical outcome findings.
Interpretation:

The investigation was designed primarily to assess implementation feasibility; clinical outcomes were exploratory.

Limitations:
  • The study was conducted at a single academic institution.
  • Treatment allocation followed alternating calendar periods rather than individual randomization.
  • The sample size reflected institutional surgical volume and was not calculated for efficacy.
Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content