Co-enrolment in critical care trials: a secondary analysis of the RECOVERY-RS trial - Summary - MDSpire

Co-enrolment in critical care trials: a secondary analysis of the RECOVERY-RS trial

  • By

  • Christopher Eleftheriou

  • Chen Ji

  • Ranjit Lall

  • Daniel F. McAuley

  • Gavin D. Perkins

  • Keith Couper

  • November 20, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To quantify the incidence of co-enrolment, evaluate variability across hospitals, and explore the influence of co-enrolment on trial findings in the RECOVERY-RS trial.

Key Findings:
  • 62% of participants (789 out of 1,273) were co-enrolled in another study.
  • Co-enrolment rates varied from 25% to 97% across hospitals.
  • Co-enrolled participants were more often male, of white ethnicity, and had no co-morbidities.
  • No significant difference in tracheal intubation (41% vs 36%) or mortality (18% vs 20%) rates between co-enrolled and non-co-enrolled participants.
Interpretation:

High rates of co-enrolment are achievable in critical care trials, and co-enrolment did not materially influence the trial findings.

Limitations:
  • Variability in co-enrolment rates across hospitals may affect generalizability.
  • Differences in patient characteristics between co-enrolled and non-co-enrolled participants.
Conclusion:

The RECOVERY-RS trial demonstrated that co-enrolment is feasible and does not significantly impact trial outcomes, suggesting potential for innovative research designs.

Original Source(s)

Related Content