Is This the New Norm?: <br>Is Overcomplicating Ortho-k the New Normal?</br> - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Is This the New Norm?: <br>Is Overcomplicating Ortho-k the New Normal?</br>

  • By

  • Mile Brujic, OD, FAAO

  • DAVID L. KADING, OD, FAAO

  • September 1, 2026

  • 5 min

Share

Objective:

To discuss the current state of orthokeratology (ortho-k) in the United States and address misconceptions regarding its complexity.

Approach:
  • FOKUS Study: The Fitting of Orthokeratology in the United States (FOKUS) study estimates nearly 3,000 active ortho-k prescribers in the U.S., primarily for myopia management.
  • SMART Study: The SMART study indicated an 80.5% success rate with the first lens fit and 95.5% required only one lens change.
Key Findings:
  • Ortho-k is underutilized despite its benefits in myopia management, as indicated by the FOKUS study.
  • Early ortho-k fittings required frequent follow-ups for optimal lens design, as noted in the source material.
  • The SMART study shows improved success rates, with 80.5% of first lens fits being successful and 95.5% requiring only one lens change.
Interpretation:

The perception that fitting ortho-k lenses is complicated is influenced by continuing education courses that focus on troubleshooting, as discussed in the source material.

Limitations:
  • The perception of complexity may deter new practitioners from adopting ortho-k, as highlighted in the source.
  • Success rates may vary based on individual practitioner experience and patient characteristics, as noted in the studies.
Conclusion:

Emphasizing clear vision and effective fits over perfect topography may enhance ortho-k adoption and success, as suggested by the findings.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content