Comparison of Opioid-Free Versions of Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Inhalational Anesthesia in Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial - Summary - MDSpire

Evaluation of Opioid-Free Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Inhalational Anesthesia in Bariatric Surgical Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Study

  • By

  • Pawel Maciejewski

  • Tomasz Skladzien

  • Michal Cicio

  • Lukasz Tabin

  • Tomasz Lonc

  • Olga Szkudlarek

  • Tomasz Klimczyk

  • Anna Kwinta

  • Aleksandra Zmuda

  • Tomasz Drygalski

  • Piotr Major

  • Michal Terlecki

  • July 20, 2026

Share

Objective:

To compare the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) within 24 hours after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients receiving opioid-free TIVA with propofol versus opioid-free inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane.

Approach:
  • Study Design: A single-center, prospective, parallel-group randomized controlled trial comparing two opioid-free anesthesia techniques for patients undergoing elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.
  • Patient Eligibility: Adult patients with severe obesity scheduled for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were screened for inclusion, with specific exclusion criteria.
  • Randomization and Blinding: Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the TIVA group or the Sevo group, with measures taken to maintain blinding for postoperative assessments.
  • Anesthesia Protocol: Standardized multimodal analgesic preload was administered before induction, followed by general anesthesia induction using either TIVA with propofol or inhalation with sevoflurane.
Key Findings:
  • The study aimed to determine the differences in PONV incidence between TIVA and inhalational anesthesia.
  • Secondary objectives included comparing postoperative pain scores, 24-hour opioid requirements, intraoperative hemodynamic events, and early recovery characteristics.
Interpretation:

The study's findings will provide insights into the effectiveness of opioid-free anesthesia techniques in bariatric surgery.

Limitations:
  • The study was conducted at a single center, which may limit generalizability.
  • Anesthesiologists could not be blinded to group assignment due to the nature of the interventions.
Conclusion:

The study evaluates the comparative effectiveness of two opioid-free anesthesia techniques in bariatric surgery, focusing on postoperative outcomes.

Original Source(s)

Related Content