Comparative study of triple intravenous chemotherapy versus dual chemotherapy combined with hepatic arterial infusion in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer - Summary - MDSpire

Comparative study of triple intravenous chemotherapy versus dual chemotherapy combined with hepatic arterial infusion in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer

  • By

  • Aimin Zhou

  • Lichao Wang

  • Chijin Xiao

  • Yunan Shi

  • June 18, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of FOLFOXIRI triplet chemotherapy with FOLFIRI combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases.

Approach:
    Key Findings:
    • FOLFIRI plus HAIC group had a higher ORR (56.9% vs. 44.8%, p = 0.163) and DCR (89.2% vs. 68.7%, p = 0.004) compared to FOLFOXIRI group.
    • Significantly longer PFS in FOLFIRI plus HAIC group (10.3 months vs. 8.2 months, log-rank p = 0.038).
    • Median OS was numerically longer in FOLFIRI plus HAIC group (19.5 months vs. 17.9 months), but not statistically significant (log-rank p = 0.150).
    • Higher R0 resection rate in FOLFIRI plus HAIC group (21.5% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.044).
    • Grade 3/4 adverse events were comparable between groups (30.8% vs. 38.8%, p = 0.333).
    Interpretation:

    FOLFIRI plus HAIC was associated with improved disease control and prolonged PFS compared to FOLFOXIRI.

    Limitations:
    • Retrospective and non-randomized design.
    • Findings should be interpreted cautiously and validated in prospective randomized studies.
    Conclusion:

    FOLFIRI plus HAIC demonstrated superior outcomes in disease control and PFS compared to FOLFOXIRI in patients with unresectable liver metastases.

Original Source(s)

Related Content