Case Report: Navigating the bleeding-thrombosis paradox: regional nafamostat anticoagulation in a post-intracerebral hemorrhage patient on VV-ECMO - Summary - MDSpire
Advertisement
Case Report: Navigating the bleeding-thrombosis paradox: regional nafamostat anticoagulation in a post-intracerebral hemorrhage patient on VV-ECMO
To explore the use of nafamostat mesylate (NM) for regional anticoagulation in a VV-ECMO patient following intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and to assess the impact of infusion site on coagulation outcomes.
Approach:
Patient Background: A 41-year-old male with a history of hypertension, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease underwent emergency hematoma evacuation for a right basal ganglia hemorrhage and later developed severe ARDS requiring VV-ECMO.
Anticoagulation Strategy: Initially, heparin was used with a target aPTT of 35-45, but due to suspected rebleeding, anticoagulation was switched to an anticoagulant-free strategy, leading to significant thrombosis.
Nafamostat Administration: Nafamostat was initiated at 10 mg/h; however, initial infusion at the conventional post-pump site failed to achieve effective regional anticoagulation.
Infusion Site Optimization: Relocating the NM infusion to the pre-pump position established a significant circuit-to-systemic aPTT gradient, enabling effective anticoagulation while minimizing bleeding risk.
Key Findings:
Nafamostat mesylate can be effectively used for regional anticoagulation in VV-ECMO patients post-ICH.
Infusion site significantly impacts coagulation outcomes, with pre-pump infusion yielding better results.
Interpretation:
The findings suggest that optimizing the infusion site for NM may enhance its efficacy in achieving regional anticoagulation in VV-ECMO.
Limitations:
The study is based on a single patient case, limiting generalizability.
Further research is needed to validate the findings in a larger cohort.
Conclusion:
This case study provides insights into the management of anticoagulation in high-bleeding-risk patients on ECMO.