Long-term outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy vs. medical care in patients with large ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - Summary - MDSpire
Advertisement
Long-term outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy vs. medical care in patients with large ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
To assess the long-term clinical benefits of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) compared to standard medical care (MC) in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion-related large ischemic infarcts, specifically focusing on outcomes beyond 90 days.
Key Findings:
EVT significantly improved functional excellence (mRS 0–1; RR = 3.84, p < 0.001), functional independence (mRS 0–2; RR = 3.13, p < 0.001), and independent ambulation (mRS 0–3; RR = 2.01, p < 0.001) at long-term follow-up.
Mortality rates were not significantly different between EVT and MC (RR = 0.90, p = 0.19).
EVT reduced the risk of death or dependency (mRS 4–6; RR = 0.78, p < 0.001).
Long-term follow-up showed more significant prognostic improvements with EVT compared to short-term follow-up.
Interpretation:
EVT provides significant long-term functional benefits for patients with anterior circulation LVO-related large ischemic infarcts, with enhanced outcomes observed over time, particularly in patients with shorter onset times and smaller infarct volumes, reinforcing the need for updated treatment guidelines.
Limitations:
The analysis is limited to high-quality RCTs, which may not fully represent all patient populations, potentially skewing the generalizability of the results.
Potential biases in study selection and reporting could affect the results, particularly in terms of outcome reporting and patient demographics.
Conclusion:
In patients with anterior circulation LVO-related large ischemic infarcts, EVT combined with MC leads to significant long-term functional improvements compared to MC alone, with benefits increasing over time.