Comparative efficacy of non-pharmacological therapies in adolescents with subthreshold depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis - Summary - MDSpire

Comparative efficacy of non-pharmacological therapies in adolescents with subthreshold depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

  • By

  • Qipei Ji

  • Zhenbo Wang

  • Xiaobo Wang

  • Ling Zhou

  • Zhenkui Lou

  • Meiling Su

  • Xin Gao

  • Shufang Jiang

  • Hongfei Qiu

  • Zhongchun Luo

  • May 12, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To compare the relative effectiveness of various non-pharmacological interventions for adolescent subthreshold depression (SD) using network meta-analysis.

Key Findings:
  • 30 RCTs with 3,471 participants were included.
  • Non-pharmacological interventions significantly improved depressive symptoms (pooled SMD = -0.93, 95% CI: -1.20 to -0.66).
  • Behavioral activation (BA) was the most effective intervention (SMD = -3.45, 95% CI: -4.89 to -2.02), followed by physical exercise intervention (PEI) (SMD = -1.34, 95% CI: -2.68 to -0.03) and light therapy (LT) (SMD = -1.24, 95% CI: -2.17 to -0.31).
Interpretation:

Non-pharmacological interventions are effective for adolescents with SD, with BA recommended as the first-line clinical option.

Limitations:
  • High heterogeneity across studies, which may affect the reliability of the findings.
  • Single-study evidence for some interventions (e.g., LT, PEI) limits the generalizability of results.
  • Broad age range of participants may introduce variability in treatment response.
  • Lack of long-term follow-up data restricts understanding of sustained effects.
Conclusion:

Further large-scale, multi-center RCTs are needed to validate these findings and guide clinical practice.

Original Source(s)

Related Content