Exploring the relationship between novel serum inflammatory markers, non-traditional lipid parameters, and in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-center retrospective study - Summary - MDSpire

Exploring the relationship between novel serum inflammatory markers, non-traditional lipid parameters, and in-stent restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-center retrospective study

  • By

  • Mingliang Du

  • Miao Jiang

  • Hui Hui

  • July 9, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To investigate the correlation and predictive value of novel systemic inflammatory indices and non-traditional lipid parameters for in-stent restenosis (ISR) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.

Approach:
  • Study Design: A single-center, retrospective study enrolling 564 patients who underwent initial DES implantation and received follow-up coronary angiography at least six months later.
  • Patient Groups: Patients were divided into ISR (n = 112) and non-ISR (n = 452) groups.
  • Data Collection: Clinical data and laboratory parameters were collected, including various inflammatory indices and non-traditional lipid parameters.
  • Statistical Analysis: Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors independently associated with ISR, and ROC curve analysis was used to evaluate predictive performance.
Key Findings:
  • Adjusted logistic regression identified CRI-II (OR = 1.277, 95% CI: 1.066–1.529, p = 0.008) and LCI (OR = 1.010, 95% CI: 1.002–1.018, p = 0.020) as independent risk factors for ISR.
  • ROC analysis showed CRI-II had an AUC of 0.586 (P = 0.005) and LCI had an AUC of 0.571 (P = 0.020), indicating limited discriminatory ability.
Interpretation:

CRI-II and LCI are significantly associated with ISR after PCI but show limited discriminatory ability, with all AUC values below 0.7.

Limitations:
  • The study is retrospective and conducted at a single center, which may limit generalizability.
  • All AUC values were below 0.7, indicating that the findings are exploratory signals only.
Conclusion:

CRI-II and LCI exhibit statistical associations with ISR but are not ready for clinical recommendation for ISR risk stratification.

Original Source(s)

Related Content