Living-donor kidney transplantation: comparison of robotic-assisted versus conventional open technique in obese recipients - Summary - MDSpire

Living-donor kidney transplantation: comparison of robotic-assisted versus conventional open technique in obese recipients

  • By

  • Alice Rondot

  • Stephan Levy

  • Jérémy Mercier

  • Anne Sophie Bajeot

  • Arnaud Del Bello

  • Nassim Kamar

  • Xavier Gamé

  • Nicolas Doumerc

  • Federico Sallusto

  • Thomas Prudhomme

  • February 18, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To compare intraoperative, postoperative, and functional outcomes of obese recipients undergoing living donor robotic-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) versus open kidney transplantation (OKT).

Key Findings:
  • 46 living donor RAKT were compared to 40 OKT, all recipients were obese.
  • Median operative time was significantly longer in the OKT group (215.5 vs. 140.0 min, p < 0.0001).
  • Intraoperative major complications were similar in both groups (2.5% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.9).
  • Two conversions to open surgery occurred during RAKT due to complications.
Interpretation:

RAKT may offer a shorter operative time compared to OKT in obese patients, with comparable complication rates, suggesting it could be a viable alternative.

Limitations:
  • Retrospective design may introduce selection bias.
  • Limited sample size may affect generalizability of results.
  • Data collected from a single center may not represent broader populations.
Conclusion:

RAKT appears to be a safe and effective option for kidney transplantation in obese patients, with potential advantages over traditional techniques.

Original Source(s)

Related Content