Higher Framingham steatosis index is associated with prevalent breast cancer in women: cross-sectional evidence from NHANES 1999–2018 and an exploratory hospital-based dataset - Summary - MDSpire

Higher Framingham steatosis index is associated with prevalent breast cancer in women: cross-sectional evidence from NHANES 1999–2018 and an exploratory hospital-based dataset

  • By

  • Shuling Tang

  • Yong Mo

  • Tiansheng Su

  • Guangxiang Huang

  • Jiachao Lu

  • Jianbin Bi

  • Hui Li

  • Ligen Mo

  • Jun Yan

  • July 8, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To examine the association between the Framingham Steatosis Index (FSI) and prevalent breast cancer in women using NHANES data.

Approach:
  • Study Design: Cross-sectional analysis of female participants in NHANES 1999–2018.
  • Statistical Analysis: Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the association between FSI and prevalent breast cancer, with additional analyses for non-linearity and threshold effects.
  • Exploratory Dataset: An exploratory hospital-based dataset was analyzed to assess the association in a different clinical setting.
Key Findings:
  • Among 21,042 women, 531 (2.5%) reported a history of breast cancer.
  • Each 1-unit increase in FSI was associated with higher odds of prevalent breast cancer (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05–1.16), but this association was attenuated after adjusting for age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96–1.07).
  • Higher FSI quartiles were associated with greater odds of prevalent breast cancer.
  • Restricted cubic spline analysis suggested a non-linear association.
  • In the exploratory dataset, FSI was positively associated with breast cancer case status when modeled continuously.
Interpretation:

Higher FSI was associated with prevalent breast cancer status in women, but the association diminished after adjusting for age, indicating that FSI reflects metabolic-hepatic burden rather than serving as an age-independent marker.

Limitations:
  • Cross-sectional design precludes causal inference.
  • The association may be influenced by confounding factors not accounted for in the analysis.
Conclusion:

FSI should be interpreted as a composite marker of metabolic-hepatic burden rather than as a direct causal biomarker for breast cancer.

Original Source(s)

Related Content