Mitigating Teclistamab Toxicity: Prophylactic Tocilizumab and Timing of Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy in a Nationwide Cohort - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Reducing Toxicity Associated with Teclistamab: The Role of Prophylactic Tocilizumab and Timing for Immunoglobulin Replacement in a National Cohort Study

  • By

  • Astrid Hundebøll Torpe

  • Jonathan Thorsen

  • Gustav Mathiasen

  • Katrine Fladeland Iversen

  • Sarah Farmer

  • Thomas Lund

  • Charlotte Toftmann Hansen

  • Lene Kongsgaard Nielsen

  • Nicolai Grønne Dahlager Jørgensen

  • Maja Ølholm Vase

  • Elena Manuela Teodorescu

  • Morten Salomo

  • Christina Wennerström

  • Tobias S. Slørdahl

  • Agoston Gyula Szabo

  • May 26, 2026

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the safety management of teclistamab treatment in Denmark, focusing on cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) prevention using prophylactic tocilizumab (Toci) and infection prophylaxis with immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT).

Approach:
  • Study Design: A retrospective, academic, observational study analyzing consecutive patients receiving teclistamab for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma from February 2024 to November 1, 2025.
  • Data Collection: Data were collected through chart reviews by trained specialists and entered into a REDCap database, validated for accuracy.
  • Patient Groups: Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving prophylactic Toci (PPxToci) and those not receiving it (NoPPxToci).
Key Findings:
  • CRS occurred in 69% of the NoPPxToci group versus 8% in the PPxToci group (p = 0.001).
  • Grade 2 CRS was reported in 29% of the NoPPxToci group compared to 2% in the PPxToci group.
  • No Grade ≥ 3 CRS events were observed in either group.
  • The median duration of CRS was shorter in the PPxToci group (1.5 days) compared to the NoPPxToci group (2 days).
Interpretation:

Prophylactic administration of tocilizumab significantly reduces the incidence of CRS in patients receiving teclistamab, potentially allowing for outpatient management.

Limitations:
  • The study is retrospective and observational, which may introduce biases.
  • Data collection was limited to a specific timeframe and geographic location.
Conclusion:

Prophylactic tocilizumab appears to effectively reduce CRS rates in patients treated with teclistamab, supporting its use in clinical practice.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content