Efficacy and predictors of cognitive stimulation therapy combined with pharmacotherapy for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized controlled trial - Summary - MDSpire

Efficacy and predictors of cognitive stimulation therapy combined with pharmacotherapy for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized controlled trial

  • By

  • Li Cai

  • Xinmin Zhao

  • Chunmei Liao

  • Qin Liu

  • Shu Hu

  • Min Huang

  • June 26, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of modified cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) combined with standard drug therapy on cognitive function, activities of daily living, and quality of life in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD), and to explore key predictors of CST efficacy.

Approach:
  • Study Design: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolling 80 patients with mild-to-moderate AD, assigned to either modified CST plus standard pharmacotherapy or standard pharmacotherapy alone.
  • Intervention: The modified CST program consisted of 14 weekly 45-minute sessions.
  • Primary Endpoint: Change in the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) score from baseline to post-intervention.
  • Secondary Measures: Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale and Quality of Life in Alzheimer’s disease (QOL-AD) questionnaire.
  • Data Analysis: Data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat (ITT) approach and multivariate regression to identify independent predictors.
Key Findings:
  • The study group showed significantly better post-intervention ADAS-Cog scores than the control group (adjusted mean difference = -3.28 points, 95% CI: -3.72 to -2.83, P < 0.001).
  • Significant improvements were also noted in ADL (adjusted mean difference = -4.93, 95% CI: -8.39 to -1.47, P = 0.006) and QOL-AD (adjusted mean difference = 2.69, 95% CI: 1.01 to 4.37, P = 0.002) for the study group.
Interpretation:

Limitations:
  • The study was conducted at a single center, which may limit generalizability.
  • The sample size was relatively small, which may affect the robustness of the findings.
Conclusion:

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content