How do multifood allergy treatments compare? - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

How do multifood allergy treatments compare?

  • By

  • Kathryn Wighton

  • September 30, 2026

  • 4 min

Share

Objective:

To compare the treatment success rates of omalizumab and omalizumab-facilitated multiallergen oral immunotherapy (MOIT) among patients with multifood allergies.

Approach:
  • Study Design: A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (OUTMATCH) conducted at 10 US academic centers.
  • Participants: 117 participants aged 1 to 55 years with peanut allergy and at least 2 additional food allergies were enrolled.
  • Treatment Protocol: Participants received 16 weeks of open-label omalizumab followed by either omalizumab-facilitated MOIT or omalizumab with placebo MOIT for 44 weeks.
  • Endpoints: The primary endpoint was a cumulative-tolerated dose of at least 4,044 mg for each of 3 foods without dose-limiting symptoms.
Key Findings:
  • 36% of participants receiving omalizumab met the primary endpoint compared to 19% receiving MOIT.
  • 88% of participants receiving omalizumab completed the study versus 51% in the MOIT group.
  • Serious adverse events occurred in 31% of those receiving MOIT compared to 0% in the omalizumab group.
  • 72% of participants receiving omalizumab tolerated at least 444 mg of all 3 allergens compared to 39% in the MOIT group.
Limitations:
  • Smaller-than-planned sample size after early stage 1 enrollment.
  • Selection of the primary endpoint may have been overly optimistic.
  • Participants may not represent the broader population with food allergies.
Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content