Berberine alleviates biofilm-associated immune-inflammatory injury in Staphylococcus aureus-induced osteomyelitis: insights from network pharmacology and experimental validation - Summary - MDSpire

Berberine alleviates biofilm-associated immune-inflammatory injury in Staphylococcus aureus-induced osteomyelitis: insights from network pharmacology and experimental validation

  • By

  • Xuan Deng

  • Lin Zhang

  • Jinglin Li

  • Fuyin Yang

  • Chengrui Peng

  • Jiaze Peng

  • Yang Yu

  • Xianpeng Huang

  • Xuxu Yang

  • Lidan Yang

  • July 13, 2026

Share

Objective:

To investigate the effects of Berberine (BBR) against Staphylococcus aureus (SA)-induced osteomyelitis (OM) and explore potential mechanisms through network pharmacology and validation.

Approach:
  • In vitro and In vivo Studies: An in vitro SA biofilm model was established to assess BBR's effects on bacterial survival and biofilm structure. A mouse model of SA-induced OM was used, with a clindamycin-treated group as a positive comparator.
  • Microscopic and Biochemical Analysis: Biofilm formation was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and serum inflammatory mediators were measured by ELISA. Histopathological changes were evaluated by H&E staining.
  • Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking: Network pharmacology was performed to identify targets and pathways, with key proteins validated by Western blotting.
Key Findings:
  • BBR significantly reduced bacterial viability within biofilms and decreased CFU counts in vitro.
  • Microscopic observations showed disrupted biofilm architecture and reduced biofilm coverage after BBR treatment.
  • In vivo, BBR alleviated bone destruction, reduced implant-associated biofilm formation, and decreased inflammatory cell infiltration.
  • ELISA results indicated that BBR markedly reduced pro-inflammatory mediator levels.
  • Network pharmacology identified PTGS2 as a key target and implicated the HIF-1 signaling pathway.
Interpretation:

BBR exerts protective effects against SA-induced OM through antibiofilm and anti-inflammatory activities, but its antibacterial efficacy is weaker than that of clindamycin.

Limitations:
  • BBR should not be regarded as a replacement for antibiotics but rather as an adjunctive therapy for biofilm-associated osteomyelitis.
Conclusion:

BBR demonstrates potential in mitigating immune-inflammatory damage in SA-induced osteomyelitis, warranting further investigation.

Original Source(s)

Related Content