Silent refractoriness in epilepsy care: cross-sectoral analysis of prescribing patterns, referrals and workforce capacity in Saxony - Summary - MDSpire

Unrecognized Challenges in Epilepsy Management: A Cross-Sector Analysis of Prescription Trends, Referral Practices, and Workforce Availability in Saxony

  • By

  • Thomas Mayer

  • Johannes Lemke

  • Felix Von Podewils

  • Brigitte Scheid

  • Torsten Kraya

  • Susanne Hallmeyer-Elgner

  • Joseph Classen

  • Karel Kostev

  • Sonya C. Faber

  • Adam Strzelczyk

  • July 21, 2026

Share

Objective:

To evaluate structural disparities in prescribing patterns, referral behavior, and workforce distribution in Saxony, a federal state with above-average epilepsy prevalence and treatment intensity.

Approach:
  • Data Sources: Integrated IQVIA LRx® prescription data, Disease Analyzer prevalence estimates, and anonymized outpatient referral data from the DGfE-certified epilepsy center.
  • Assessment Method: Utilization assessed using Days of Therapy (DOT), focusing on levetiracetam as a proxy for focal epilepsy care.
  • Workforce Distribution: Estimated using Bundesärztekammer data.
  • Expert Panel Contextualization: Findings contextualized through a multidisciplinary expert panel.
Key Findings:
  • Approximately 36% of patients met a pharmacological proxy for drug resistance, but only a minority accessed specialized care.
  • Prescribing patterns showed a preference for levetiracetam across all sectors, with regional variations in the levetiracetam to lamotrigine ratios.
  • Adoption of newer antiseizure medications was concentrated in specialized hubs.
  • Referral activity was uneven, with minimal connectivity to formal escalation pathways in several regions.
Interpretation:

Epilepsy care in Saxony is characterized by challenges in managing therapy-resistant patients, who often remain in decentralized care without systematic progression to specialized evaluation.

Limitations:
  • The study may not capture all factors influencing referral practices and prescribing patterns.
  • Regional variations may not be fully representative of broader trends across Germany.
Conclusion:

Identified gaps highlight the need for standardized referral criteria, strengthened cross-sectoral networks, and regional accountability mechanisms.

Original Source(s)

Related Content