VCTE vs. histology in MASLD - Summary - MDSpire

VCTE vs. histology in MASLD

  • By

  • Doug Brunk

  • January 6, 2026

  • 2 min

Share

Objective:

To compare the prognostic accuracy of vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE)-based liver stiffness measurement (LSM) with liver biopsy for predicting liver-related events (LREs) in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).

Key Findings:
  • Mean age of participants was 51.9 years; 57.3% were men.
  • Median baseline LSM was 8.8 kPa; one-third had advanced fibrosis (F3–F4).
  • During a median follow-up of 56.6 months, 126 patients (3.6%) developed LREs, primarily due to hepatic decompensation.
  • Five-year AUROC values for LSM and histology were nearly identical (0.870 vs 0.869).
  • No significant differences in discrimination improvement metrics were observed.
Interpretation:

LSM obtained by VCTE shows comparable prognostic performance to liver biopsy for predicting LREs in MASLD, suggesting it may serve as a practical alternative in clinical settings.

Limitations:
  • The study's findings are based on a specific cohort and may not be generalizable to all populations.
  • Potential biases inherent in observational studies.
Conclusion:

LSM via VCTE may be a viable surrogate prognostic endpoint in clinical trials and for risk stratification in MASLD.

Original Source(s)

Related Content