Telerehabilitation in children and adolescents with intellectual disability: a systematic review - Summary - MDSpire

Telerehabilitation in children and adolescents with intellectual disability: a systematic review

  • By

  • Martina Micai

  • Letizia Gila

  • Angela Caruso

  • Daniela Morelli

  • Maria Grazia Totino

  • Giulia Balboni

  • Carmen Belacchi

  • Alessandra Colucci

  • Chiara Fantini

  • Tiziana Metitieri

  • Margherita Orsolini

  • Alessandra Rampazzi

  • Ciro Ruggerini

  • Cristiana Stefani

  • Marco Bertelli

  • Francesca Fulceri

  • Maria Luisa Scattoni

  • June 11, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the impact of telerehabilitation interventions on cognitive, behavioural, and functional outcomes in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities (ID), addressing the limited existing evidence.

Key Findings:
  • 28 studies involving 668 participants were included.
  • Telerehabilitation was associated with improvements in language and communication skills, challenging behaviours, executive functions, and motor outcomes.
  • Parent-mediated and telehealth-delivered behavioural interventions showed evidence in reducing externalizing behaviours and parental stress.
  • Digital cognitive training programmes demonstrated feasibility and short-term gains in working memory and attention, though long-term effects were less consistent.
  • Interventions targeting lifestyle and mental health showed promising but preliminary results.
  • Studies varied significantly in design, intervention protocols, and outcome measures, with frequent methodological limitations impacting the overall findings.
Interpretation:

Telerehabilitation appears to be a feasible and potentially effective approach for supporting children and adolescents with ID, particularly with active caregiver involvement.

Limitations:
  • Substantial variability in study designs and intervention protocols.
  • Frequent methodological limitations across included studies.
  • Lack of consistent long-term outcome data, which affects the reliability of findings.
Conclusion:

Larger and methodologically robust studies are needed to define intervention characteristics and assess long-term outcomes, while addressing the methodological limitations identified, as well as the development of hybrid care models integrating in-person and remote approaches.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content