Chronological age was not independently associated with ultra-early safety or arrhythmic outcomes after contemporary atrial fibrillation ablation: a real-world single-center study - Summary - MDSpire

Chronological age was not independently associated with ultra-early safety or arrhythmic outcomes after contemporary atrial fibrillation ablation: a real-world single-center study

  • By

  • Gennaro De Rosa

  • Marco Giuggia

  • Mattia Peyracchia

  • Martina Peddis

  • Roberto Di Summa

  • Elisa Pelissero

  • Giuseppe Trapani

  • Fabio Ugliano

  • Francesco Fiore

  • Giuseppe Corazzelli

  • Plinio Cirillo

  • Gaetano Senatore

  • July 7, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To assess the association between age and early procedural safety and ultra-early arrhythmic outcomes following AF ablation in an unselected real-world cohort.

Approach:
  • Study Design: Retrospective analysis of 217 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter ablation for atrial fibrillation between January 2022 and December 2023.
  • Age Analysis: Age was analyzed using three predefined cutoffs (< 65, < 70, < 80 years) and as a continuous variable.
  • Endpoints: Primary safety endpoint: composite of pericardial effusion, periprocedural bleeding, stroke or TIA, acute coronary events, cardiovascular or procedure-related death. Secondary endpoint: composite of AF recurrence and persistence within 48 hours.
  • Statistical Analysis: Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the independent association between age and outcomes.
Key Findings:
  • No significant differences in early complications or arrhythmic outcomes across age cutoffs.
  • Age was not independently associated with procedural safety (OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.93–1.06; p = 0.812), AF recurrence (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.97–1.05; p = 0.77), or AF persistence (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.96–1.05; p = 0.91).
Interpretation:

Age alone may not be a major determinant of ultra-early procedural outcomes in appropriately selected patients undergoing AF ablation.

Limitations:
  • Single-center study may limit generalizability.
  • Retrospective design may introduce selection bias.
Conclusion:

Age was not independently associated with procedural safety or ultra-early arrhythmic outcomes following AF ablation.

Original Source(s)

Related Content