A Single-center experience of subperineural resection of intracranial schwannomas and the clinical course following subtotal resection - Summary - MDSpire

A Single-center experience of subperineural resection of intracranial schwannomas and the clinical course following subtotal resection

  • By

  • Azuna Tomioka

  • Ryota Tamura

  • Junki Sogano

  • Kosuke Karatsu

  • Konosuke Ishikawa

  • Taichi Sayanagi

  • Takenori Akiyama

  • Ryo Ueda

  • Masahiro Toda

  • June 24, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the effectiveness of the subperineural resection technique in preserving neurological function and analyze postoperative outcomes in patients with intracranial schwannomas.

Approach:
  • Patient Population: Retrospective analysis of 186 patients who underwent intracranial schwannoma resection from April 2011 to March 2022.
  • Data Collection: Clinical and surgical data were collected, focusing on tumor characteristics, extent of resection, and postoperative symptoms.
  • Surgical Methods: Standardized surgical techniques were employed by multiple neurosurgeons, utilizing subperineural dissection.
  • Statistical Analysis: Statistical comparisons were made using appropriate tests, and regrowth-free survival was assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves.
Key Findings:
  • Total resection rates for CN V (n=15), VII (n=4), VIII (n=148), IX–XI (n=12), and XII (n=3) schwannomas were 53.3%, 75%, 70.3%, 50%, and 0%, respectively.
  • Regrowth occurred in 12/44 (27.3%) of CN VIII and 4/7 (57.1%) of CN V subtotal resection cases.
  • Postoperative growth rates for CN VIII schwannomas were 0.22 mm/year and 126.3 mm³/year; for CN V, 0.7 mm/year and 23 mm³/year.
  • Higher regrowth rates were observed in CN IX–XI (5/6, 83.3%) and CN XII (2/3, 66.7%) schwannomas.
Interpretation:

Subperineural resection is effective in preserving neurological function, but subtotal resection remains unavoidable in some cases, with varying regrowth rates based on cranial nerve origin.

Limitations:
  • Retrospective design may introduce bias.
  • Small sample sizes for certain cranial nerve schwannomas limit generalizability.
Conclusion:

Further large-scale analyses stratified by nerve origin are warranted.

Original Source(s)

Related Content