Prone position ventilation combined with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in patients with pulmonary infection: a retrospective study on evidence-based nursing practice - Summary - MDSpire

Prone position ventilation combined with high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in patients with pulmonary infection: a retrospective study on evidence-based nursing practice

  • By

  • Wenjun Lai

  • Jing Fei

  • Ye Gao

  • Yan He

  • July 6, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To examine the clinical and nursing outcomes associated with prone position ventilation (PPV) combined with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy in patients with pulmonary infection.

Approach:
  • Study Design: Retrospective analysis of 200 patients with pulmonary infection admitted to two tertiary hospitals between January 2022 and January 2024.
  • Patient Groups: Patients were divided into an observation group (n = 100; PPV combined with HFNC) and a control group (n = 100; conventional oxygen therapy).
  • Outcome Measures: Outcomes included PaO2/FiO2 ratio, SpO2, respiratory rate, length of hospital stay, complication and ICU-admission rates, and nurse-assessed comfort and compliance.
  • Statistical Analysis: Longitudinal data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA and Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc comparisons, along with multivariable-adjusted and sensitivity analyses.
Key Findings:
  • The observation group showed greater improvements in PaO2/FiO2 ratio and SpO2 over the first 72 hours compared to the control group.
  • Nurse-assessed comfort and compliance scores were higher in the observation group.
  • Total complications were lower in the observation group (9.0% vs. 45.0%).
  • ICU admission rates were lower in the observation group (5.0% vs. 19.0%).
  • Length of hospital stay was shorter in the observation group (8.7 ± 2.4 vs. 12.0 ± 2.9 days).
Interpretation:

PPV combined with HFNC oxygen therapy was associated with better respiratory outcomes and fewer complications compared to conventional oxygen therapy, but causality cannot be established due to non-randomized allocation.

Limitations:
  • The study was non-randomized, which limits the ability to establish causality.
  • Findings are based on a retrospective analysis and may not be generalizable to all patient populations.
Conclusion:

In this retrospective, non-randomized cohort, PPV combined with HFNC oxygen therapy was associated with better respiratory outcomes, fewer complications, shorter hospitalization and higher nurse-assessed comfort and compliance than conventional oxygen therapy.

Original Source(s)

Related Content