Malpositioned orbital implants: indications for implant removal and secondary reconstructive techniques - Summary - MDSpire

Malpositioned orbital implants: indications for implant removal and secondary reconstructive techniques

  • By

  • Sara M. Hussein

  • Basel A. Sharaf

  • Krishna Sinha

  • Andrew J. Moyo

  • Jonathan M. Morris

  • Lilly H. Wagner

  • July 17, 2026

Share

Objective:

To analyze clinical presentations, radiographic failure patterns, multidisciplinary surgical strategies, and outcomes of patients undergoing revision surgery for malpositioned orbital implants.

Approach:
  • Study Design: A single-center retrospective consecutive case series was conducted of patients who underwent removal or replacement of malpositioned orbital implants.
  • Data Collection: Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, radiographic findings, surgical approaches, implant management strategies, and postoperative outcomes were reviewed.
  • Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistics were used to summarize findings.
Key Findings:
  • Five of seven patients (71.4%) were female, with a median age of 60 years (range 29–78).
  • Diplopia and pain or swelling were the most common presenting symptoms (71.4%).
  • CT scans showed implant protrusion into orbital soft tissue in 57.1% of patients.
  • 57.1% of patients underwent explantation alone, while 42.9% had secondary reconstruction.
  • 80% of patients with diplopia experienced improvement or resolution post-surgery.
Interpretation:

Limitations:
  • Small sample size of only seven patients.
  • Retrospective design may limit the generalizability of findings.
Conclusion:

Individualized surgical management is crucial for malpositioned orbital implants.

Original Source(s)

Related Content