Treatment-Related Adverse Events and Health-Related Quality of Life Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment for Mucosal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Scoping Review - Summary - MDSpire

Adverse Events Related to Treatment and Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients with Mucosal Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: A Scoping Review

  • By

  • N. D. O'Donnell

  • E. C. Ward

  • L. R. Wishart

  • R. Perera

  • C. Barrett

  • K. A. Edmiston

  • E. Mitchell

  • A. Pigott

  • R. Pitt

  • K. Russell

  • B. A. Chan

  • R. Ladwa

  • June 1, 2026

Share

Objective:

To conduct a scoping review of the literature focusing on the nature, severity, and duration of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) experienced by HNSCC patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment, and to synthesize current evidence on health-related quality of life (HrQOL) and functional impacts.

Approach:
  • Methodology: A scoping review methodology was employed, following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and PRISMA-ScR reporting standards.
  • Search Strategy: A three-step search strategy was implemented across databases including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus, covering literature from January 2014 to October 2025.
  • Selection Criteria: Included studies involved adults with mucosal HNSCC receiving ICIs targeting the PD1/PDL1 pathway, reporting on TRAEs and/or HrQOL.
Key Findings:
  • ICIs have been shown to improve survival outcomes in R/M HNSCC compared to traditional chemotherapy.
  • TRAEs are common with ICI therapy, with a reported incidence of 62.07% for any-grade TRAEs and 13.82% for severe Grade 3–4 TRAEs.
  • Common TRAEs include rash, itching, and fatigue, with severe effects such as pneumonitis and colitis also reported.
  • The impact of TRAEs on HrQOL and functional status in HNSCC patients remains poorly understood.
Interpretation:

Despite a favorable toxicity profile compared to other treatments, the complexity of HNSCC and preexisting patient conditions may amplify the impact of TRAEs on daily functioning and quality of life.

Limitations:
  • Limited studies specifically addressing HrQOL in HNSCC patients receiving ICIs.
  • Existing literature shows substantial heterogeneity in reporting TRAEs and HrQOL outcomes.
Conclusion:

The review highlights the need for further research to understand the functional and quality of life consequences of ICI treatment in HNSCC patients.

Original Source(s)

Related Content