To identify the ethically distinctive features of non-oncological fertility preservation in women with endometriosis, women opting for social egg freezing, and transgender individuals.
Key Findings:
Challenges in reproductive autonomy and informed consent include decisional pressure and the ability to make future-oriented decisions.
The principle of beneficence highlights benefits such as safeguarding genetic parenthood and preventing future regret.
Non-maleficence reveals risks including medical, psychological, and social issues like delay in therapy and misinformation.
Social justice concerns include unequal access to fertility preservation services and gender discrimination.
Interpretation:
The ethical landscape of non-oncological fertility preservation is complex and requires a tailored approach distinct from oncological cases.
Limitations:
The study is limited to literature published between 2000 and 2025.
Focus is primarily on specific populations, which may not represent broader ethical considerations.
Conclusion:
The study underscores the need for a nuanced ethical framework for non-oncological fertility preservation, with future research needed to adapt to evolving technologies and clinical practices.
