Tennessee Plans to Share Data on Children with Disabilities with Immigration Authorities - Summary - MDSpire

Tennessee Plans to Share Data on Children with Disabilities with Immigration Authorities

  • By

  • Drishti Pillai

  • Akash Pillai

  • Samantha Artiga

  • June 29, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To inform about Tennessee's plan to share data of children with disabilities enrolled in the CSS program with immigration enforcement agencies.

Approach:
  • Data Sharing Notification: Families of approximately 400 children received notices regarding potential data sharing with immigration authorities if they remain enrolled in the CSS program beyond June 30, 2026.
  • Legal Action: A temporary restraining order was issued on June 24, 2026, to prevent the data sharing following a lawsuit by physicians.
  • Legislation Overview: Tennessee law requires verification of immigration status for public benefit applicants and mandates reporting of non-lawfully present individuals to immigration enforcement.
  • CSS Program Details: The CSS program provides services to children under 21 with disabilities and does not have immigrant eligibility restrictions.
  • Impact on Families: Health care providers warn that data sharing could lead to families withdrawing from the program, risking care disruptions.
  • National Survey Data: A KFF survey indicated increased avoidance of government programs among immigrant adults due to fears about immigration status disclosure.
  • Federal Data Sharing Agreement: In July 2025, CMS and ICE established an agreement allowing access to Medicaid enrollees' personal data for immigration enforcement.
Key Findings:
  • Tennessee's CSS program may be affected by new immigration-related data sharing requirements.
  • A temporary restraining order currently halts the data sharing initiative.
  • Legislation mandates verification of immigration status for public benefits.
  • Concerns exist regarding the chilling effect on enrollment in public benefit programs among immigrant families.
Interpretation:

Limitations:
  • The article does not provide specific outcomes from the temporary restraining order.
  • Data on the long-term effects of the legislation on enrollment in the CSS program is not available.
Conclusion:

Original Source(s)

Related Content