Clinical value of first-morning urine exfoliated cell HPV detection in the diagnosis of high-grade cervical lesions - Summary - MDSpire

Clinical value of first-morning urine exfoliated cell HPV detection in the diagnosis of high-grade cervical lesions

  • By

  • Fang Li

  • Lihua Pei

  • Juan Lv

  • Mingfu Jiang

  • Hui Yang

  • Hailan Ma

  • Ning Zhou

  • Lingfei Li

  • Ying Luo

  • Zhengfu Wang

  • Haifeng Jiang

  • Na Zhao

  • July 8, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of first-morning urine (FMU) HPV testing for detecting high-grade cervical lesions (CIN2+) compared to traditional cervical HPV testing, using histopathology as the reference standard.

Approach:
  • Study Design: A multicenter, cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study conducted prospectively involving 500 women from four institutions in Ningxia, China, between June 2025 and January 2026.
Key Findings:
  • FMU HPV detection rates were 96.25% for cervical cancer, 86.67% for CIN2-3, 58.00% for CIN1, and 28.00% for no lesions (P<0.001).
  • For CIN2+, FMU testing showed sensitivity of 90.50%, specificity of 67.00%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 64.64%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 91.36%.
  • Traditional cervical testing had sensitivity of 93.00%, specificity of 64.67%, PPV of 63.70%, and NPV of 93.27%, with no significant differences between the two methods (all P>0.05).
  • FMU testing demonstrated higher compliance (97.20% vs 84.80%) and satisfaction (95.40% vs 79.60%) compared to traditional testing (both P<0.001).
Interpretation:

FMU HPV testing shows comparable diagnostic performance to traditional cervical HPV testing for CIN2+ detection and offers better patient acceptability.

Limitations:
  • The study used a disease-enriched design, which limits the generalizability of the findings to average-risk screening populations.
  • No predefined non-inferiority margin was tested in the comparison of FMU and traditional cervical testing.
Conclusion:

FMU HPV testing is a promising non-invasive option for cervical cancer screening that warrants further validation in average-risk populations before routine implementation.

Original Source(s)

Related Content