To examine public perceptions of state laws permitting internationally trained surgeons to practice in the US without completing US residency training.
Key Findings:
Add that 74% did not consider international surgical training equivalent to US-based training.
Interpretation:
Revise to explicitly state the contrast between public support for licensure laws and personal trust issues regarding internationally trained surgeons.
Limitations:
Expand on how the limitations may impact the generalizability and applicability of the findings.
Conclusion:
While there is strong public support for licensure laws, significant concerns about training equivalence and trust in internationally trained surgeons persist.
