VR Perimetry May Match HVF in Glaucoma - Summary - MDSpire

VR Perimetry May Match HVF in Glaucoma

Virtual reality testing shortened visual field exams and was preferred among most patients in a retrospective study.

  • By

  • Andrea Surnit

  • June 3, 2026

  • 4 min

Share

Objective:

To compare virtual reality perimetry with Humphrey Visual Field testing in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma.

Key Findings:
  • Mean deviation measurements were similar: -6.8 dB (HVF) vs -6.0 dB (VR).
  • Pattern standard deviation values were comparable: 5.6 dB (HVF) vs 6.3 dB (VR).
  • Testing duration was significantly shorter with VR perimetry (122 seconds) compared to HVF (253 seconds).
  • A majority of patients (41 out of 48) preferred VR perimetry over HVF.
Interpretation:

Correlations between the two modalities were strong (0.82 for mean deviation, 0.85 for pattern standard deviation), indicating comparable performance.

Limitations:
  • Retrospective design and modest sample size.
  • Single-center setting may limit generalizability.
  • Potential learning or fatigue effects due to testing order.
  • Different luminance ranges and testing algorithms between devices.
Conclusion:

VR perimetry may serve as an effective adjunct in glaucoma management, especially where HVF access is limited.

Original Source(s)

VR Perimetry May Match HVF in Glaucoma

  • by Andrea Surnit

  • June 3, 2026

Related Content

AAO Opens Call for Course Proposals for Academy 2026 Anaheim

The American Academy of Optometry (AAO) has opened its call for course proposals for the educational program at Academy 2026 Anaheim, inviting optometrists and educators to submit lectures, workshops, and interactive sessions for consideration.

The relationship between corneal biomechanics and endothelial morphology: evidence from a Saudi cohort

Improving Glaucoma Clinic Workflow

At ASCRS 2026, Sahar Bedrood, MD, PhD, outlined workflow changes that reduce bottlenecks and improve clinic throughput.