VR Perimetry May Match HVF in Glaucoma - Summary - MDSpire

VR Perimetry May Match HVF in Glaucoma

Virtual reality testing shortened visual field exams and was preferred among most patients in a retrospective study.

  • By

  • Andrea Surnit

  • June 3, 2026

  • 4 min

Share

Objective:

To compare virtual reality perimetry with Humphrey Visual Field testing in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma.

Key Findings:
  • Mean deviation measurements were similar: -6.8 dB (HVF) vs -6.0 dB (VR).
  • Pattern standard deviation values were comparable: 5.6 dB (HVF) vs 6.3 dB (VR).
  • Testing duration was significantly shorter with VR perimetry (122 seconds) compared to HVF (253 seconds).
  • A majority of patients (41 out of 48) preferred VR perimetry over HVF.
Interpretation:

Correlations between the two modalities were strong (0.82 for mean deviation, 0.85 for pattern standard deviation), indicating comparable performance.

Limitations:
  • Retrospective design and modest sample size.
  • Single-center setting may limit generalizability.
  • Potential learning or fatigue effects due to testing order.
  • Different luminance ranges and testing algorithms between devices.
Conclusion:

VR perimetry may serve as an effective adjunct in glaucoma management, especially where HVF access is limited.

Original Source(s)

VR Perimetry May Match HVF in Glaucoma

  • by Andrea Surnit

  • June 3, 2026

Related Content

The Evolving Glaucoma Toolbox

Justin Schweitzer, OD, FAAO, and Jessica Steen, OD, FAAO, describe emerging technologies, treatment strategies, and clinical considerations that can help eyecare professionals (ECPs) identify glaucoma earlier and better manage progression.

New UK Framework for Glaucoma Care

Backed by major ophthalmic organizations, new NHS guidance seeks to standardize glaucoma services across England

  • June 4, 2026

  • 2 min
Patient experience of and barriers to the eye examination