Insulin resistance as a predictor of long-term adverse cardiovascular event risk in patients with atrial fibrillation following radiofrequency catheter ablation - Summary - MDSpire

Insulin resistance as a predictor of long-term adverse cardiovascular event risk in patients with atrial fibrillation following radiofrequency catheter ablation

  • By

  • Hanxiong Liu

  • Junli Pan

  • Yan Luo

  • Yan Tang

  • Dongyue Jia

  • Jie Feng

  • Yuqi Tao

  • Sisi Wang

  • Shiqiang Xiong

  • Wei Huang

  • July 2, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the association between four non-insulin-based insulin resistance (IR) indices and long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), and to determine their incremental predictive value beyond established clinical risk factors.

Approach:
  • Study Design: A retrospective observational study involving 922 non-valvular AF patients who underwent RFCA from March 2017 to July 2023.
  • Endpoints: The primary endpoint was a composite of MACEs, including all-cause death, late AF recurrence, heart failure events, and stroke after a 3-month blanking period.
  • Statistical Analysis: Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, restricted cubic spline analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival estimation were used to examine associations and quantify predictive value.
Key Findings:
  • MACEs occurred in 242 patients (26.25%) over a median follow-up of 36 months.
  • METS-IR and TyG-BMI were significantly associated with elevated MACE risk (P < 0.001).
  • METS-IR showed a linear dose-response relationship with MACEs.
  • Adding METS-IR to the baseline clinical model improved the C-statistic from 0.702 to 0.717 (P < 0.001).
  • METS-IR provided meaningful net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).
Interpretation:

METS-IR demonstrated a statistically significant incremental improvement in predicting composite MACE in AF patients following RFCA.

Limitations:
  • The study is retrospective and may have inherent biases.
  • The findings are based on a single-center cohort, which may limit generalizability.
Conclusion:

METS-IR may contribute to improved risk assessment in post-ablation AF patients.

Original Source(s)

Related Content