Determinants of survival after re-resection for recurrent glioblastoma: a meta-analysis - Summary - MDSpire

Determinants of survival after re-resection for recurrent glioblastoma: a meta-analysis

  • By

  • Manuel V. Baby

  • Rithvik M. Narendranath

  • Symriti Kaur-Paneser

  • Daniele S. C. Ramsay

  • Hariharan Subbiah Ponniah

  • Srikar R. Namireddy

  • Ahmed Salih

  • Ahkash Thavarajasingam

  • Daniel Scurtu

  • Andreas Kramer

  • Veit Stöcklein

  • Darius Kalasauskas

  • Dragan Jankovic

  • Florian Ringel

  • Santhosh G. Thavarajasingam

  • January 13, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To identify prognostic factors influencing survival following re-resection of glioblastoma, which may guide treatment decisions.

Key Findings:
  • Repeat resection may be associated with improved survival in recurrent GBM, suggesting a potential treatment avenue.
  • The extent of resection and MGMT promoter methylation status are significant prognostic factors, indicating areas for targeted intervention.
  • Patient factors such as age and Karnofsky Performance Status also influence survival outcomes, highlighting the need for personalized assessments.
Interpretation:

The findings suggest that certain prognostic factors can help identify patients who may benefit from re-resection, supporting more personalized treatment strategies for recurrent glioblastoma and potentially improving patient outcomes.

Limitations:
  • Heterogeneity among included studies may affect the generalizability of results, and many studies did not report IDH status, potentially confounding results.
  • Potential biases in the studies reviewed could impact the reliability of the findings.
Conclusion:

This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive assessment of prognostic factors for survival after re-resection in recurrent glioblastoma, highlighting the need for personalized treatment approaches and further research to validate these findings.

Original Source(s)

Related Content