Markers of neuroinflammation in the CSF of patients with difficult to treat psychiatric disease - Summary - MDSpire

Markers of neuroinflammation in the CSF of patients with difficult to treat psychiatric disease

  • By

  • Jocelyn X. Jiang

  • Artur Shvetcov

  • Nicole Fewings

  • Prudence Gatt

  • Suat Dervish

  • Justin Y Garber

  • Matthew Silsby

  • Alessandro F Fois

  • Stephen Duma

  • Sushil Bandodkar

  • Sudarshini Ramanathan

  • Andrew Bleasel

  • Bryne John

  • Ian B Hickie

  • Elizabeth M Scott

  • Anthony Harris

  • Ming-Wei Lin

  • Caitlin A. Finney

  • David A. Brown

  • May 4, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To investigate the presence of neuroinflammatory biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with atypical psychiatric presentations, such as treatment-resistant psychosis or mood disorders, and assess potential autoimmune contributions.

Key Findings:
  • Anti-nuclear antibodies and thyroid autoantibodies were the most common autoantibodies found in serum of psychiatric patients.
  • Only a few patients exhibited abnormal conventional CSF markers of neuroinflammation.
  • Elevated ITAC/CXCL11 levels were found in the psychiatric cohort, while TARC/CCL17 levels were lower compared to other groups.
  • 17% of patients had at least one CSF cytokine significantly elevated above the mean of the non-inflammatory neurological disease cohort, indicating potential immune involvement.
  • Six patients had their diagnoses revised based on serological evaluation and showed improvement with immunosuppression.
Interpretation:

A subset of patients with atypical psychiatric disorders may have an underlying immune-mediated process, suggesting the need for reevaluation of their diagnoses and treatment approaches, particularly in cases of treatment resistance.

Limitations:
  • Small sample size may limit generalizability of findings.
  • The study is observational and does not establish causation.
  • Potential confounding factors, such as comorbid psychiatric conditions and varying treatment histories, were not fully controlled.
Conclusion:

The findings indicate that immune contributions may play a role in some atypical psychiatric disorders, warranting further investigation and consideration of autoimmune mechanisms in treatment-resistant cases.

Original Source(s)

Related Content