Comparison of subxiphoid and lateral intercostal approaches for video-assisted thoracoscopic extended thymectomy: a retrospective cohort study - Summary - MDSpire

Comparison of subxiphoid and lateral intercostal approaches for video-assisted thoracoscopic extended thymectomy: a retrospective cohort study

  • By

  • Shuai Shi

  • Zhenlin Jiang

  • Zuxin Dong

  • Junting Chen

  • Jianhua Yan

  • June 22, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To compare perioperative, neurological, and short-term oncologic outcomes between subxiphoid and lateral intercostal approaches in video-assisted thoracoscopic extended thymectomy (VATET).

Approach:
    Key Findings:
    • Baseline characteristics and histopathological features were comparable between groups (P > 0.05).
    • The ICA group had lower intraoperative blood loss, shorter postoperative stay, shorter drainage duration, and lower hospitalization costs (all P < 0.05).
    • VAS scores on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7 were lower in the SA group (all P < 0.001).
    • Complication rates were similar between groups (8.24% vs. 6.02%, P > 0.05).
    • Neurological outcomes in myasthenia gravis were similar between groups.
    • Thymoma recurrence occurred in two patients in each group.
    Interpretation:

    Both approaches are safe and feasible for VATET. The lateral intercostal approach improves operative efficiency, while the subxiphoid approach reduces early postoperative pain without affecting neurological or short-term oncologic outcomes.

    Conclusion:

    Both surgical approaches are viable for VATET, with distinct advantages in terms of pain management and operative efficiency.

Original Source(s)

Related Content