To compare the short-term functional outcomes and complication profile of modified low-caliber HoLEP (mLC-HoLEP) using a 21 Fr internal urethrotomy sheath with standard HoLEP.
Approach:
Method: label
Method: text
Key Findings:
mLC-HoLEP demonstrated comparable functional outcomes to standard HoLEP, with specific metrics indicating similar efficacy.
The use of a 21 Fr sheath reduced the risk of urethral trauma, as evidenced by lower reported rates of complications.
No significant differences in complication rates between mLC-HoLEP and standard HoLEP were observed, with both techniques showing acceptable safety profiles.
Interpretation:
The modified technique using a 21 Fr sheath may provide a safe and effective alternative to standard HoLEP in settings with limited resources.
Limitations:
The single-center nature of the study may limit the generalizability of the findings to broader populations.
The retrospective design may introduce selection bias, affecting the reliability of the outcomes.
Conclusion:
mLC-HoLEP using a 21 Fr internal urethrotomy sheath presents a potential alternative in resource-constrained environments, warranting further investigation.
