GLP-1 RA Plus SGLT2i Versus Monotherapy in MASLD and Type 2 Diabetes: Three Pairwise Target Trial Emulations - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Comparative Analysis of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors Versus Monotherapy in Patients with MASLD and Type 2 Diabetes: Insights from Three Target Trial Emulations

  • By

  • Mohanad A. Alkuwaiti

  • Faisal A. Al-Harbi

  • Ahmed K. Alsaif

  • Ziyad M. AlSughayyir

  • Rayan Saleh Alsaud

  • Mohammed N. Aljabr

  • Ahmad K. Alanazi

  • Ahmad A. Alosaily

  • Abdulrhman K. Alabdulqader

  • Hamza Almusabeh

  • Rayyan F. Altemani

  • Ahmed Y. Azzam

  • July 13, 2026

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 RA plus SGLT2i combination therapy versus GLP-1 RA monotherapy versus SGLT2i monotherapy for mortality, cardiovascular, and hepatic outcomes in patients with MASLD and T2DM.

Approach:
  • Study Design: Conducted as a target trial emulation following TARGET reporting guidelines, emulating three pairwise trials with a 5-year follow-up.
  • Data Source: Utilized the TriNetX Research Network, accessing electronic health records from 110 healthcare organizations across the U.S.
  • Eligibility Criteria: Included adults aged 18+ with ICD-10-CM codes for MASLD and T2DM, excluding those with competing liver disease etiologies.
  • Treatment Strategies: Defined treatment strategies based on ATC classification codes, with combination therapy identified by overlapping prescriptions within a 30-day window.
Key Findings:
  • MASLD prevalence is approximately 32.4% globally.
  • Patients with concurrent MASLD and T2DM have higher rates of hepatic fibrosis progression and cardiovascular mortality compared with those with either condition alone.
  • GLP-1 RAs have shown improvements in cardiovascular outcomes and established hepatoprotective effects, while SGLT2is have demonstrated cardiovascular and renal protection.
Interpretation:

The study addresses the comparative effectiveness of combination therapy versus monotherapy in patients with MASLD and T2DM.

Limitations:
  • No randomized controlled trials have directly compared the therapies in this population.
  • Prior studies lacked adequate confounding control and longer follow-up.
Conclusion:

The study seeks to provide insights into the comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i therapies in patients with MASLD and T2DM.

Original Source(s)

Related Content