To investigate how differences in patient portal message writing style and content affect clinician response rates, particularly among historically marginalized groups.
Approach:
Data Analysis: Analyzed 3.6 million patient-initiated medical advice message threads from 511,020 adult patients using natural language processing.
Sample Selection: Excluded non-English messages, resulting in 989,602 threads for text-based analysis.
Outcome Measurement: Primary outcomes included response rates from care teams and target clinicians, with secondary outcomes measuring response times and expanded definitions of response.
Key Findings:
Black patients had a 3.7-percentage point lower target clinician response rate compared to White patients, representing a 12% reduction relative to the 32% mean response rate.
Message content accounted for 6% of the response gap among Black patients compared to White patients.
Writing style influenced response rates significantly, accounting for 48% of the target clinician response gap among Black patients.
Higher response rates were associated with messages that included the clinician's name, positive sentiment, and longer word counts.
Interpretation:
[Writing style was a potential explanation for approximately half of the observed disparities in care team response,] wrote lead study author Mitchell Tang, PhD, of the Harvard Kenneth C. Griffin Graduate School of Arts and Sciences at Harvard University, and colleagues.
Limitations:
Data derived from a single academic health system, limiting generalizability.
Excluded non-English messages and did not capture all aspects of message content or writing style.
Cross-sectional design limits causal conclusions.
Conclusion:
[The study highlights the significant role of writing style in clinician response disparities, particularly among marginalized groups,] wrote lead study author Mitchell Tang, PhD, and colleagues.
Adults assigned to nonnutritive sweetened beverages or water maintained weight reductions through 104 weeks, with no statistically significant difference between groups.
The federal settlement resolves allegations of unlawful controlled substance prescribing and absent patient records and restricts future DEA registration for certain controlled substances.