Efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies against respiratory syncytial virus disease in premature infants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis - Summary - MDSpire
Advertisement
Efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies against respiratory syncytial virus disease in premature infants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease in premature infants.
Approach:
Literature Search: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from inception through December 2025.
Statistical Analysis: Effect estimates were expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals, and treatment rankings were evaluated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability.
Study Inclusion: Included 7 randomized controlled trials involving 4 drugs and 11,319 infants.
Nirsevimab showed the most significant effect on RSV-related hospitalization rates (RR: 0.20) and ICU admissions (RR: 0.09).
No significant differences were found in mechanical ventilation use, RSV-related deaths, and drug-related adverse events.
Interpretation:
Nirsevimab, motavizumab, and palivizumab are effective in reducing RSV-related hospitalizations and ICU admissions in preterm infants, with nirsevimab showing the greatest effect.
Limitations:
Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
The analysis is limited to randomized controlled trials and may not represent all clinical scenarios.
Conclusion:
Nirsevimab, motavizumab, and palivizumab are effective in reducing RSV-related hospitalizations and ICU admissions in preterm infants, with nirsevimab showing the greatest effect.