To analyze the divisions within the pro-choice movement in Madagascar and their impact on abortion law reform efforts.
Approach:
Key Informant Interviews: Conducted interviews with 20 members of civil society, journalists, and politicians in Madagascar.
Key Findings:
Civil society mobilizations for abortion law reform in Madagascar are hindered by internal divisions.
Disagreements exist on issue framing and mobilization tactics among pro-choice advocates.
The US global gag rule and anti-gender movements have negatively impacted advocacy efforts in sub-Saharan Africa, restricting the space for debate and funding.
Interpretation:
Limitations:
The study is based on a limited number of interviews (n=20), which may not represent the broader civil society landscape.
Focus is primarily on Madagascar, limiting generalizability to other contexts.
Conclusion:
There is a role for regional learning and exchange to help overcome national divisions and strengthen coalitions for advancing reproductive rights.
